Anti-Trend
Nonconformist Geek
Yeah, pretty much I was suggesting that if freedom and open source doesn't mean much to you philosophically and you're happy enough with Windows technologically, there's not much besides curiosity to motivate you to learn.
[ot]
For me curiosity was part of what motivated me to learn Linux, but I was also disgusted with the direction Microsoft is going. From Windows 2000 to XP showed a lot of bloat and resource hungriness. The jump from XP to Vista confirms this is the direction MS is heading. That in mind, there isn't a single day I regret jumping from the MS ship and swimming for the shores of open source. :D On that note, even if Linux didn't exist and I only had to choose between Mac OS X and Windows, it'd be Apple all the way.
[ot]
OS X is already based on FreeBSD, so it's fundamentally light years ahead of Windows in terms of architecture. It does slow down a bit over time though, due to limitations of HFS+... not nearly as severely as good ol' 'doze though. :)[/ot]I know that this is a questionnaire for Windows users, but I just like to join :)
For me curiosity was part of what motivated me to learn Linux, but I was also disgusted with the direction Microsoft is going. From Windows 2000 to XP showed a lot of bloat and resource hungriness. The jump from XP to Vista confirms this is the direction MS is heading. That in mind, there isn't a single day I regret jumping from the MS ship and swimming for the shores of open source. :D On that note, even if Linux didn't exist and I only had to choose between Mac OS X and Windows, it'd be Apple all the way.