Radeon HD 3850 256MB VS. GeForce 8800 GT 256MB

A

Apollo1020

Geek Trainee
Here:

crysis_1280.jpg


I'm sure, that it's about Radeon HD 3850 256MB, because our local PC journal says the same (24FPS) about 256MB version.

P.S. This image/review was taken from LegitReviews.com.
 
lol, you are realising that the top two are crossfired and the 8800s are single card, right? the 3850 alone gets 24 fps while the 8800GT (the 512 I have been recommending) gets 33.
 
Maybe you were recommending 512MB version of GeForce 8800 GT, but in 256MB with equal amount of graphics memory - ATI wins... does that mean, that ATI's GPUs are better? WOW... I thought it's NVIDIA, who leads.

Edited: The only thing, that lacks in this test - is GeForce 8800 GS... but in equal video RAM - ATI wins.
 
lol dude nvidia pwns ati.

And it doesn't matter about how much memory they have just get the damn 512MB version and that will be plenty, the 256MB GT is a totally different design and is allot slower than the latest cards

Thats showing two 3850's in crossfile, while it's one 8800 ultra doing 10fps less alone
 
Wouldnt 3870 vs 8800GT 512 be equal ram? That means that in the cards that most people buy Nvidia wins, huh?

Oh, and look at the same test with a lower resolution (which is the only time you should ever buy a lower ram card.) You will see the 8800 256 and 8800 512 will score almost identicle. Both way ahead of the 3850.

Also funny how you didnt put the other benchmark picture in there
crysis_1600.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top